A new DfT website was launched today, which explains why, by
and large, I avoid cycling on-road around my home territory of Haslemere,
Surrey. OK, I ride to the station, and I
ride to the town centre and its shops, but I can do that on quiet residential
streets and lanes where traffic is light.
For someone who was minded to do the same from here, however, it would be
a different story.
Here are a few numbers gleaned from the site. For 2011, comparing Surrey with its next-door
neighbour Hampshire (which, for these purposes, excludes the main cities of
Portsmouth and Southampton. Surrey
County Council covers all urban and rural communities within the county):
2011
|
Hampshire
|
Surrey
|
|||
Resident population ('000)
|
1306
|
1134
|
|||
Total road length (miles)
|
5518
|
3437
|
|||
Total miles driven (million miles)
|
9237
|
8459
|
|||
Road safety spend
|
|||||
Total (£'000 pa)
|
7597
|
4427
|
|||
per resident (£ pa)
|
5.82
|
3.90
|
|||
per mile of road (£ per mile)
|
1377
|
1288
|
|||
per mile driven (£ per million m)
|
0.82
|
0.52
|
|||
Total casualties
|
|||||
per 10,000 pop
|
31.93
|
50.74
|
|||
per 100m miles
|
38.64
|
55.44
|
I haven’t shown casualties per mile. In many ways that is a false comparison
because it is inevitable that a big city will do badly on that score. The Cities of London and Westminster for
example score worst of all on that measure, but the volume of traffic, motorised,
cyclised or pedestrian, is far higher – true casualty rates per person or per
mile travelled are much worse in the country.
I also have shown only total casualties. You could look at KSIs (killed or seriously
injured) but in practical terms, the thing which deters people from walking or
cycling is not the risk of death, rather it is the risk of any form of injury,
even slight, a fact which the dinosaur cycling advocacy groups even now don’t
fully recognise when they cite the surely-now-busted hypothesis of “safety in
numbers”
Surrey’s spend on road safety is considerably lower, not
only in pure value terms, but also by reference to its population, the size of
its road network, and the total vehicle mileage driven. Total casualties are considerably higher.
Well, there’s a surprise!
No comments:
Post a Comment