Which local authority enjoys a higher bicycle use –
according at least to the recent DfT analysis of travel trends by borough –
than Bristol or Hackney, but you have never heard of it?
See here:
Local Authority
|
5 x per week
|
Rank
|
3 x per week
|
Rank
|
|
Cambridge
|
37
|
1
|
43
|
1
|
|
City of London
|
18
|
2
|
29
|
2
|
|
Isles of Scilly
|
17
|
3
|
21
|
3
|
|
Oxford
|
12
|
4
|
17
|
4
|
|
York
|
10
|
5
|
15
|
5
|
|
Norwich
|
9
|
6=
|
11
|
7=
|
|
Bristol, City of
|
9
|
6=
|
10
|
12
|
|
Gosport
|
8
|
8=
|
15
|
6
|
|
Hackney
|
8
|
8=
|
11
|
7=
|
|
Lambeth
|
7
|
10
|
10
|
13
|
On the DfT’s highest-frequency statistic of percentage of sample cycling 5+ times per week
Gosport, near Portsmouth on the Hampshire coast, ranks 8th equal
with Hackney and just behind Bristol. If
you broaden the sample out and include 3+ per week – I wouldn’t pretend the
lower frequencies in the analysis mean anything – Gosport ranks above both.
I’m not sure this celebrated status is widely recognised, in fact I doubt that even the burghers of
Gosport have noticed yet. Certainly we
hear plenty about Cambridge, and not a little about Bristol and York, but I
have never seen an article or blog post in the cycling media about
Gosport. All I have found in my
researches are these articles in the Portsmouth Evening News from 2004
and 2007.
So, what does Gosport have which makes it a bicycling
borough on this scale?
Unlike Cambridge, Oxford or York, Gosport does not have a
large student population, in fact beyond school age it has no student
population at all.
Unlike Bristol, Gosport has never enjoyed the kind of
ring-fenced funding that comes with Cycling Town status.
It does however share one particular characteristic with
Oxford, Cambridge, York and Norwich: it
is flat.
Other geographic al factors are that the borough is fairly
compact, about three miles from side to side and it has a typical south-coast climate – mild
and dry.
There is a key historical factor in the development of a
cycling culture here too. Gosport is in
essence a Naval town. A short foot-ferry-ride
across the harbour mouth from Portsmouth, it has long had connections with the
Royal Navy, largely now defunct, including the principal submarine base at HMS
Dolphin, the engineering schools at HMS Daedalus and HMS Sultan, the (nuclear)
ammunitions stores at HMS Frater, the helicopter repair facility at Fleetlands,
dock facilities at Priddy’s Hard, small-arms practice ranges at Browndown, the
naval hospital at Haslar, and a huge housing estate at Rowner for families of Jack
Tars away at sea on Her Majesty’s ships.
Many of these establishments are conservation sites or listed buildings,
so cannot be adapted to accommodate the car.
Back in the day, they employed large workforces which initially would
not have known what a car was, then couldn’t afford one, and finally couldn’t
have found anywhere to park one. So,
they relied on the bicycle, and to some
extent still do to this day. The old
establishments are long gone due to forces reductions, but at one time you
could be treated to the awesome sight of the end of the shift, when hordes of dockers would
perform what resembled a Le Mans Start through the turnstiles to the bike sheds
and then take off, in a peloton resembling Tour de France squared, in the
direction of home.
Many others worked in the dockyards in Portsmouth. A quick look at the map will show you that
Portsmouth is little more than walking distance away if you take the harbour
ferry, up to 15 miles if you drive around the harbour.
Finally, there are man-made factors. Another look at the map will show you that
Gosport is surrounded on three sides by water – the Solent and Portsmouth
Harbour. Access to the rest of the UK is
constricted to a single quadrant, to the north-west, and all traffic has to
enter or leave through that bottleneck.
In practical terms, there are just three roads out, one towards
Southampton and the other two towards Fareham, which has its own constricting
features. Gosport is apparently the
largest town in the country not to have its own railway station.
The traditional industries associated with the Royal Navy
have been in decline for decades now, and the employment they once provided has
gone too. Practically no new industry
has – until recently at least - been attracted to the area to replace what was
lost. Meanwhile some of the sites were
handed over to house builders. Local
residents have long complained about this.
In the 80s, when Hampshire was under pressure to accept more housing and
“Solent City” was being conceived, local residents complained loudly about how
the infrastructure (mainly the sewers, for some reason) would not be able to
cope with the increased population, and where were the jobs for these new
residents to work at? But, the local
authorities’ planners were evidently unable, or unwilling, to attack the issue.
The result is that there is about 0.46 jobs for every
working-age resident of the borough. The
choice is don’t work, or travel out of area to work. Those local access routes are among the most
congested suburban routes in the country.
On the positive side, the council has invested a great deal
more in cycle infrastructure than most other local authorities. Curiously, they don’t bang the drum about it,
perhaps because they feel embarrassed about the conditions which incentivised
them to do so.
A look at their own cycle routes map will show that they have
a fairly extensive network of road-side separated cycle paths – shared use in
the main, but also mainly a decent width and in low pedestrian footfall
areas. I don’t know Bristol, or York, but
my recollection of Oxford and Cambridge is that they are less well served. (Before anyone is tempted to compare Gosport
with Assen however, please don’t –this is England, after all.)
How useful they actually are, is something I plan to cover
in future posts.
No comments:
Post a Comment